Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 overall score. The LG V60 ThinQ is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Galaxy S8 Active, although it's also just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs more than Galaxy S8 Active, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.