Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, getting an 84.7 score against 81.9. Motorola Edge (2022)'s design is extremely newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. The Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 Active features a little more vivid display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher display pixel density. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a slightly bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge (2022) shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with better video frame rates and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.