Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. Although the Galaxy S8 Active is a better phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must highlight that it's also incredibly older, much thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active and the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion count with very similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way worse screen pixels density and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S8 Active has a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels, a lot better video quality and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.