Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than Galaxy S8 Active, having a overall score of 81.9 against 81.9. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Galaxy S8 Active. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a just a bit worse amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S8 Active features a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.