Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's overall score of 81.9. Motorola Moto G200 5G is a a lot newer device, and it's also a little lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Moto G200 5G has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better pixels count in each inch of display. Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Moto G200 5G has superior battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Moto G200 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.