Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G71 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active, having a overall score of 82.9 against 81.9. The Moto G71 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy S8 Active. Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better display than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater display density.
Motorola Moto G71 5G's CPU is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's CPU, and although the Motorola Moto G71 5G has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto G71 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Moto G71 5G shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G71 5G also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Moto G71 5G has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.