Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having an 81.9 score against 79.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a better cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, we must tell that it's also a noticeably older, thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Hyper. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S8 Active features a much better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a better display density. Motorola One Hyper takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S8 Active and Motorola One Hyper count with extremely similar batteries.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.