Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2's score of 79.7. Even being the best phone we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active construction is a lot older, heavier and way thicker than OPPO Find X2. OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a little bit lower pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3168px resolution. OPPO Find X2 shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has better video frame rates, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.