Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is an extremely older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a battery performance that is very similar to the Galaxy S8 Active one, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.