Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, having a global score of 83.1 against 81.9. OPPO Find X2 Pro is a much newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a bigger screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rate, a lot larger sensor and a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.