Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 81.9 score against 76. Despite being the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also much older, somewhat heavier and way thicker. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a lot lower pixels number per display inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate and a camera with way more mega pixels.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.