Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | -- |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's general score of 77. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's design is somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a better pixels number in each screen inch.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels. The Galaxy S8 Active features a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.