Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a overall score of 81.9 against 79.9. Although it's the best we compare here, it must be told that it's also a way older, thicker and just a little heavier phone. The Galaxy S8 Active has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos and a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way better resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.