Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than Galaxy S8 Active, having an 88.1 score against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a a lot newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S8 Active, although it is a bit heavier. The Galaxy F62's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy S8 Active one, because although the Galaxy F62 has lesser processing cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater screen pixel density. Galaxy F62 has a lot better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.