Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-10-01 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T is a little bit better than Galaxy S8 Active, having an 87.9 score against 81.9. Xiaomi Mi 10T's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy S8 Active's, although it is also just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 10T takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.