Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite's global score of 81.2. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, but it is somewhat thicker and was released 3 years before. Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy S8 Active's processor, and although the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a better screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 4820mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also counts with a lot more MP back camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.