Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-04-16 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.82 x 5.25 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 11.18 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Ceramic |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 1860 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 388 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 80.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold's 79.8 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is notably older and much thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, it's body is still noticeably lighter. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.