Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a general score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, we must note that it's also a much older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot worse display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera and a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Galaxy S8 Active costs more than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.