Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, with an 81.9 score against 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active body is way older, thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S8 Active features a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better pixels density. The Galaxy S8 Active features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S8 Active also has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features superior battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Galaxy S8 Active, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a way more MP camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a better device, it costs more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.