Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, getting a overall score of 82.4 against 81.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction is noticeably newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a little more money than the Galaxy S8 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S8 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S8 Active, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.