Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | -- |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, getting a score of 81.9 against 77.1. Galaxy S8 Active's construction is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 2080 x 2400px resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a much powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.