Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 global score. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a very superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much worse count of pixels in each display inch and a much lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.