Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a global score of 83.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a a lot newer phone, and it is also notably lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy S8 Active. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a little bit better screen than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2710 resolution and a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.