Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Galaxy S8, having a global score of 93.3 against 81.7. Although iPhone 13 Pro is incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S8, it's a little thinner and also a lot newer. The iPhone 13 Pro features a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy S8, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a little bit worse resolution of 1170 x 2532px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and the same video resolution, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has faster video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit more storage to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. IPhone 13 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S8. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S8, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.