Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | -- |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a general score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S8's 81.7 score. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s construction is notably thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy S8. The Galaxy S8 counts with a lot better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a way better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much greater processing power than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.