Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 568 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is a bit better than Honor Magic 6 Pro's general score of 76.6. The Galaxy S8 design is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than the Honor Magic 6 Pro. Honor Magic 6 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S8 has a bit more vivid screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot bigger back camera sensor, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro has a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has an 87% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.