Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S8, getting an 85.4 score against 81.7. LG K92 is a incredibly newer phone than the Galaxy S8, but it's much heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy S8 counts with a much better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better screen density.
The LG K92 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S8, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S8 counts with a bit better processor than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
LG K92 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The LG K92 shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S8. If you want to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S8, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.