Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2017-04-21 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's 81.3 general score. Samsung Galaxy S8 is an older and a little bit thicker device than LG V35 ThinQ, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Galaxy S8 features just a bit better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG V35 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments and a much better resolution camera.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.