Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy S8's global score of 81.7. LG V60 ThinQ's body is way newer than Galaxy S8's, although it is thicker and much heavier. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 has a slightly better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960. LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S8, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity. LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way higher video definition and a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S8. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S8, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.