Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is slightly better than the Moto G 5G, having a score of 81.7 against 81.5. Galaxy S8's construction is a lot thinner and notably lighter than the Moto G 5G, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy S8 has a little faster CPU than Moto G 5G. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S8 counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Moto G 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Moto G 5G also has a much higher resolution camera.
The Moto G 5G counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.