Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a general score of 81.7 against 76. Samsung Galaxy S8's body is thinner and much lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy S8 counts with a much better performing processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures and videos in low-light situations and a lot tinier back camera sensor shooting way lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.