Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-04-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G60, with an 81.7 score against 79.5. Even though Galaxy S8 is much older than the Motorola Moto G60, it's body is incredibly thinner and notably lighter. Galaxy S8 features a better screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Moto G60's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy S8, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Moto G60 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G60 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G60 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G60 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.