Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. Samsung Galaxy S8 is a noticeably lighter and thinner phone than the Motorola Moto G60s. The Galaxy S8 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a more vivid display than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater pixel number per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G60s counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G60s has a superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto G60s has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a lot more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.