Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 81.7 against 78.6. The Galaxy S8 design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Power, although it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy S8 counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot greater screen density.
Moto G9 Power has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S8, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy S8 has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Motorola Moto G9 Power features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and faster video frame rates.
Moto G9 Power has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.