Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-04-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 81.7 score against 77.4. Galaxy S8's body is just a bit heavier and extremely thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S8. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S8 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a little larger screen, a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S8 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S8 also has a bigger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S8 features a little better battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh.
The Galaxy S8 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.