Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2017-04-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is just a bit better than Motorola One Action, getting an 81.7 score against 78.5. Galaxy S8's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Action. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video quality and the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S8 also has a larger aperture for better low light photography.
The Motorola One Action has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Action features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S8 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.