Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Although Galaxy S8 is extremely older than Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is much lighter and thinner. The Galaxy S8 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher screen density. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S8 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.