Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S8's general score of 81.7. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S8, but it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy S8 counts with a better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a way higher number of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola razr (2020) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a way more megapixels camera.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S8 features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S8. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S8, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.