Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 568 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S8 counts with a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a much better video definition. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.