Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, getting an 81.7 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy S8 is a lighter phone than the OPPO Find X2, but both are 0.31inches thick. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos, a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X2 has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.