Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S8, getting an 83.1 score against 81.7. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy S8's, but it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera with a way higher resolution, better video frame rates and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.