Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having an 81.7 score against 76. The Galaxy S8 design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it is lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features just a little better processing power than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S8, because although it has a much lower display pixel density and a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and better video frame rate.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S8 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.