Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having an 81.7 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy S8 is a lighter but just a little bit thicker device than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit better screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back camera with a much higher resolution. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.