Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Even though the Galaxy S8 is way older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is just a bit thinner and way lighter. The Galaxy S8 features a way better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A25 5G has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.