Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having an 81.7 score against 79.4. Galaxy S8 is an noticeably older phone than the Galaxy A35 5G, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S8 features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S8 features slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.