Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's 76 overall score. Galaxy S8 is a lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S8 has a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cores.
Galaxy S24 FE has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot worse count of pixels per screen inch and a lot worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 57 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy S8 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S8 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.