Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-04-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 568 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy S8 design is much lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Galaxy S8 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit lower 1440 x 2560px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S8. They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy S8 features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and a same size back camera sensor, the Galaxy S8 also counts with a much better video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Galaxy S8 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.