Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | -- |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a global score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8's 81.7 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's body is much heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy S8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S8 captures a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Galaxy S8 has a little bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a superior battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.