Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro has a score of 93.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S9's global score of 83.3. The iPhone 13 Pro design is much newer and a bit thinner, but also way heavier than Samsung Galaxy S9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy S9, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 13 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro. They have a same size camera aperture, a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy S9 features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 400 GB. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 3095mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S9. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S9, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.