Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 14 Pro is better than Galaxy S9, having a 95.6 score against 83.3. IPhone 14 Pro's body is way newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy S9's, although it is extremely heavier. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit worse 1179 x 2556 resolution and a little bit inferior pixel quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Galaxy S9 counts with more storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Apple iPhone 14 Pro counts with a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S9, because although it has 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP.
IPhone 14 Pro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S9. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 14 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S9, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.